Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Phi 4Which is better in 2026?

Phi 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi 4 is 5.0x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Command R+ vs Phi 4 — which is better?

Command R+ (by Cohere) and Phi 4 (by Microsoft) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Phi 4 is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU). Phi 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Phi 4 is roughly 5.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Command R+ also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Command R+ if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window

Choose Phi 4 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 5.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Phi 4 is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Phi 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Jun 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Phi 4 costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 3.6x more expensive than Phi 4 ($0.07/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 7.1x more expensive than Phi 4 ($0.14/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Command R+ is more expensive than Phi 4.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Jun 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
Microsoft
Phi 4
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

89.3B diff

Command R+ has 89.3B more parameters than Phi 4, making it 607.5% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4
14.7Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
14.7B
Phi 4

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Command R+ accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Phi 4's 16,000 tokens. Command R+ can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Phi 4 is limited to 16,000 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4
Input16,000 tokens
Output16,000 tokens
Thu Jun 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Phi 4 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Phi 4

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Phi 4 was released on 2024-12-12.

Phi 4 is 3 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.8 years ago

Phi 4

Dec 12, 2024

1.5 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Command R+'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command R+'s cutoff date.

Command R+

—

Phi 4

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. Phi 4 is available from DeepInfra.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Phi 4

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.14/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Microsoft
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher MMLU score (84.8% vs 75.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
Microsoft
Phi 4

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Phi 4.

Which is better, Command R+ or Phi 4?

Phi 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Phi 4 is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command R+ compare to Phi 4 in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Phi 4 scores MMLU: 84.8%, HumanEval+: 82.8%, HumanEval: 82.6%, MGSM: 80.6%, MATH: 80.4%.

Is Command R+ cheaper than Phi 4?

Phi 4 is 3.6x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. Phi 4 costs $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Phi 4?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Phi 4 supports 16K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Phi 4?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 16K), input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.07/M), licensing (CC BY-NC vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Phi 4?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Phi 4 is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons