Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Comparing Command R+ and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ($0.80/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Command R+ is more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Command R+

Input tokens$0.25

Output tokens$1.00

Best providerCohere

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Input tokens$0.15

Output tokens$0.80

Best providerFireworks

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

131.0B diff

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 has 131.0B more parameters than Command R+, making it 126.0% larger.

Command R+

104.0Bparameters

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

235.0Bparameters

104.0B

Command R+

235.0B

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Command R+'s 128,000 tokens. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Command R+ is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Command R+

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Input262,144 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 was released on 2025-07-22.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is 11 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.7 years ago

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Jul 22, 2025

10 months ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is available from Fireworks, Novita.

Command R+

Cohere

Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Command R+

View details

Cohere

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Command R+	Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Which is better, Command R+ or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Command R+ (Cohere) and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Command R+ compare to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 scores ZebraLogic: 95.0%, MMLU-Redux: 93.1%, IFEval: 88.7%, MultiPL-E: 87.9%, Creative Writing v3: 87.5%.

Is Command R+ cheaper than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 costs $0.15/M input and $0.80/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.15/M), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.