Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Qwen3 MaxWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Command R+ and Qwen3 Max across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Command R+ vs Qwen3 Max — which is better?

Command R+ (by Cohere) and Qwen3 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Command R+ is roughly 3.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3 Max also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Command R+ if…

  • cost matters — it's about 3.7x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3 Max if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and Qwen3 Maxdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Command R+ costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Qwen3 Max ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Qwen3 Max ($5.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 Max is more expensive than Command R+.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jul 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$5.00
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

896.0B diff

Qwen3 Max has 896.0B more parameters than Command R+, making it 861.5% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
1.0Tparameters
104.0B
Command R+
1000.0B
Qwen3 Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 Max accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Command R+'s 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 Max can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Command R+ is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
Input256,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Jul 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Qwen3 Max uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Qwen3 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Qwen3 Max was released on 2025-12-15.

Qwen3 Max is 16 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.9 years ago

Qwen3 Max

Dec 15, 2025

7 months ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. Qwen3 Max is available from Novita.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Qwen3 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 Max

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (256,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and Qwen3 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 Max
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Qwen3 Max.

Which is better, Command R+ or Qwen3 Max?

Command R+ (Cohere) and Qwen3 Max (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Command R+ compare to Qwen3 Max in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Qwen3 Max scores AIME 2025: 81.6%, t2-bench: 74.8%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.0%, SuperGPQA: 65.1%.

Is Command R+ cheaper than Qwen3 Max?

Command R+ is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. Qwen3 Max costs $0.50/M input and $5.00/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Qwen3 Max?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 Max supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Qwen3 Max?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 256K), input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.50/M), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Qwen3 Max?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Qwen3 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons