DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base Comparison

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) ($0.28/1M tokens) is 2.8x more expensive than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) ($0.42/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) is more expensive than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$0.42
Best providerDeepSeek
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

661.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) has 661.0B more parameters than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base, making it 2754.2% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)
685.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
24.0Bparameters
685.0B
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)
24.0B
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base's 128,000 tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) is limited to 8,192 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) does not.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) is licensed under MIT, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)

MIT

Open weights

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) was released on 2025-12-01, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base was released on 2025-03-17.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) is 9 months newer than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)

Dec 1, 2025

3 months ago

8mo newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Mar 17, 2025

12 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking) is available from DeepSeek. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is available from Mistral AI. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Non-thinking)

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.42/1M

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison