Model Comparison

DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Command R+

Comparing DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Command R+ across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Command R+ don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Command R+ costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($2.15/1M tokens) is 2.1x more expensive than Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is more expensive than Command R+.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$2.15
Best providerDeepinfra
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

567.0B diff

DeepSeek-R1-0528 has 567.0B more parameters than Command R+, making it 545.2% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
671.0Bparameters
Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1-0528
104.0B
Command R+

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-R1-0528 accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Command R+'s 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-R1-0528 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Command R+ is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is licensed under MIT, while Command R+ uses CC BY-NC.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

MIT

Open weights

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-R1-0528 was released on 2025-05-28, while Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30.

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is 9 months newer than Command R+.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

May 28, 2025

11 months ago

9mo newer
Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available from DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita. Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.15/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Cohere
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Cohere
Command R+

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Command R+.

Which is better, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or Command R+?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 (DeepSeek) and Command R+ (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek-R1-0528 compare to Command R+ in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.4%, SimpleQA: 92.3%, AIME 2024: 91.4%, AIME 2025: 87.5%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%. Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%.

Is DeepSeek-R1-0528 cheaper than Command R+?

Command R+ is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-R1-0528 costs $0.50/M input and $2.15/M output via deepinfra. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Command R+?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports 131K tokens and Command R+ supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Command R+?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.25/M), licensing (MIT vs CC BY-NC). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Command R+?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is developed by DeepSeek and Command R+ is developed by Cohere.