Model Comparison

DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Devstral Medium

Devstral Medium significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Devstral Medium is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek-R1-0528 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Devstral Medium is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-Bench Verified).

Devstral Medium significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Devstral Medium costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Devstral Medium ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($2.15/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Devstral Medium ($2.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is more expensive than Devstral Medium.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$2.15
Best providerDeepinfra
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-R1-0528 accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Devstral Medium's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-R1-0528 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Devstral Medium is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri May 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is licensed under MIT, while Devstral Medium uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

MIT

Open weights

Devstral Medium

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-R1-0528 was released on 2025-05-28, while Devstral Medium was released on 2025-07-10.

Devstral Medium is 1 month newer than DeepSeek-R1-0528.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

May 28, 2025

11 months ago

Devstral Medium

Jul 10, 2025

9 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available from DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita. Devstral Medium is available from Mistral AI.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.15/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Devstral Medium

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Has open weights
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (61.6% vs 44.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Devstral Medium

Devstral Medium significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is made by DeepSeek and Devstral Medium is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
DeepSeek-R1-0528 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.4%, SimpleQA: 92.3%, AIME 2024: 91.4%, AIME 2025: 87.5%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%. Devstral Medium scores SWE-Bench Verified: 61.6%.
Devstral Medium is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-R1-0528 costs $0.50/M input and $2.15/M output via deepinfra. Devstral Medium costs $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output via mistral.
DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports 131K tokens and Devstral Medium supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (131K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.40/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek-R1-0528 is developed by DeepSeek and Devstral Medium is developed by Mistral AI.