Model Comparison

DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Grok-4 Heavy

Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

DeepSeek-R1-0528 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-4 Heavy is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench).

Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$2.15
Best providerDeepinfra
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-R1-0528 specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only DeepSeek-R1-0528 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-R1-0528 does not.

Grok-4 Heavy can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4 Heavy

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is licensed under MIT, while Grok-4 Heavy uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

MIT

Open weights

Grok-4 Heavy

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-R1-0528 was released on 2025-05-28, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.

We can confirm DeepSeek-R1-0528's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

May 28, 2025

11 months ago

Grok-4 Heavy

—

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 Heavy has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while DeepSeek-R1-0528's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-4 Heavy's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-R1-0528's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

—

Grok-4 Heavy

Dec 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Has open weights
xAI
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (100.0% vs 87.5%)
Higher GPQA score (88.4% vs 81.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (50.7% vs 17.7%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (79.4% vs 73.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Grok-4 Heavy

Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is made by DeepSeek and Grok-4 Heavy is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
DeepSeek-R1-0528 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.4%, SimpleQA: 92.3%, AIME 2024: 91.4%, AIME 2025: 87.5%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%. Grok-4 Heavy scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT25: 96.7%, GPQA: 88.4%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, USAMO25: 61.9%.
DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports 131K tokens and Grok-4 Heavy supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek-R1-0528 is developed by DeepSeek and Grok-4 Heavy is developed by xAI.