Model Comparison

DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 has a slight edge in benchmark performance. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking — which is better?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 (by DeepSeek) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

DeepSeek-R1-0528 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, MMLU-Pro, SimpleQA), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, MMLU-Redux). DeepSeek-R1-0528 has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

On price, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose DeepSeek-R1-0528 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 5 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

DeepSeek-R1-0528 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, MMLU-Pro, SimpleQA), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, MMLU-Redux).

DeepSeek-R1-0528 has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-R1-0528 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($0.45/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($2.15/1M tokens) is 1.6x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($3.49/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is more expensive than DeepSeek-R1-0528.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$2.15
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input tokens$0.45
Output tokens$3.49
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

435.0B diff

DeepSeek-R1-0528 has 435.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking, making it 184.3% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
671.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
236.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1-0528
236.0B
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-R1-0528's 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while DeepSeek-R1-0528 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-R1-0528 does not.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-R1-0528 was released on 2025-05-28, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 4 months newer than DeepSeek-R1-0528.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

May 28, 2025

1.2 years ago

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

10 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available from DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.15/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.45/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.49/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.98/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.95/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive output tokens
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (17.7% vs 13.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (85.0% vs 83.8%)
Higher SimpleQA score (92.3% vs 44.4%)
Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Higher AIME 2025 score (89.7% vs 87.5%)
Higher MMLU-Redux score (93.7% vs 93.4%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-R1-0528
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Which is better, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 has a slight edge in benchmark performance. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-R1-0528 compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.4%, SimpleQA: 92.3%, AIME 2024: 91.4%, AIME 2025: 87.5%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking scores ZebraLogic: 97.3%, DocVQAtest: 96.5%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, CountBench: 93.7%, MMLU-Redux: 93.7%.

Is DeepSeek-R1-0528 cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 1.1x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-R1-0528 costs $0.50/M input and $2.15/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking costs $0.45/M input and $3.49/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.45/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.