DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Comparing DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
DeepSeek · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
On price, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is roughly 3.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
- cost matters — it's about 3.1x cheaper per token
Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Playground indexes and blind preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.10/1M tokens) is 4.3x cheaper than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ($0.43/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.40/1M tokens) is 2.2x cheaper than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ($0.87/1M tokens).
In conclusion, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 has 1529.4B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, making it 2166.3% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is limited to 128,000 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under MIT.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
MIT
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B was released on 2025-01-20, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released on 2026-08-13.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is 19 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.
Jan 20, 2025
1.6 years ago
Aug 13, 2026
1 weeks ago
1.6yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is available from DeepInfra. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Novita, Together.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813.