The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B leads the LLM Stats Score 14.8 to -4.9.

DeepSeek · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 14.8 to -4.9, ranking #214 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 14.8 and ranks #214 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
14.8
#214
-4.9
#336
15.0
#208
-4.9
#327
8.6
#164
3.0
#205
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
16.7#191
-5.3#302
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

63.6B diff

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B has 63.6B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 908.6% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
70.6Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
70.6B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is licensed under MIT, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

MIT

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B was released on 2025-01-20, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 3 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.3 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B leads the LLM Stats Score 14.8 to -4.9. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is made by DeepSeek and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B scores MATH-500: 94.5%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 65.2%, LiveCodeBench: 57.5%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B supports 128K tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (14.8 vs -4.9), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is developed by DeepSeek and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.