Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Grok Code Fast 1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Grok Code Fast 1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Grok Code Fast 1 — which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B (by DeepSeek) and Grok Code Fast 1 (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is roughly 3.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok Code Fast 1 also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 3.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Grok Code Fast 1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.10/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1 ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.40/1M tokens) is 3.8x cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1 ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok Code Fast 1 is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok Code Fast 1 accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok Code Fast 1 is limited to 10,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input256,000 tokens
Output10,000 tokens
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is licensed under MIT, while Grok Code Fast 1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

MIT

Open weights

Grok Code Fast 1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B was released on 2025-01-20, while Grok Code Fast 1 was released on 2025-08-28.

Grok Code Fast 1 is 7 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Jan 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

Grok Code Fast 1

Aug 28, 2025

9 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is available from DeepInfra. Grok Code Fast 1 is available from xAI.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

Grok Code Fast 1

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
xAI
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Grok Code Fast 1.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B or Grok Code Fast 1?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B (DeepSeek) and Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B compare to Grok Code Fast 1 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B scores MATH-500: 94.5%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 65.2%, LiveCodeBench: 57.5%. Grok Code Fast 1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 70.8%.

Is DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra. Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.20/M input and $1.50/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Grok Code Fast 1?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B supports 128K tokens and Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Grok Code Fast 1?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 256K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.20/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Grok Code Fast 1?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is developed by DeepSeek and Grok Code Fast 1 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons