The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 14.5. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is 14.1x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Max leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 14.5, ranking #11 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Max wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is roughly 14.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3.8 Max also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

  • cost matters — it's about 14.1x cheaper per token

Choose Qwen3.8 Max

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.9 and ranks #11 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
14.5
#234
51.9
#11
14.7
#228
50.6
#11
8.6
#178
39.6
#14
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.10 / M
$1.65 / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
$4.95 / M
Context window
128,000
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Qwen3.8 Max
16.5#203
33.8#52
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B · 42 for Qwen3.8 Max

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Max is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.10/1M tokens) is 16.5x cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max ($1.65/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.40/1M tokens) is 12.4x cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max ($4.95/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.8 Max is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
Input tokens$1.65
Output tokens$4.95
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2329.4B diff

Qwen3.8 Max has 2329.4B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, making it 3299.4% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
70.6Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
2.4Tparameters
70.6B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
2400.0B
Qwen3.8 Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.8 Max accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Max supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B does not.

Qwen3.8 Max can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.8 Max uses Qwen3.8-Max License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8-Max License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen3.8 Max was released on 2026-08-02.

Qwen3.8 Max is 19 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen3.8 Max

Aug 2, 2026

1 months ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3.8 Max is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Novita, Together.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

Qwen3.8 Max

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.65/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.95/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen3.8 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Qwen3.8 Max.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B or Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 14.5. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B compare to Qwen3.8 Max in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B scores MATH-500: 94.5%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 65.2%, LiveCodeBench: 57.5%. Qwen3.8 Max scores PaperBench: 93.0%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 92.9%, GPQA: 92.6%, VideoMME w sub.: 90.4%, RealWorldQA: 88.0%.

Is DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is 16.5x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3.8 Max costs $1.65/M input and $4.95/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen3.8 Max?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B supports 128K tokens and Qwen3.8 Max supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen3.8 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (14.5 vs 51.9), context window (128K vs 256K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $1.65/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Qwen3.8-Max License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen3.8 Max?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3.8 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.