The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs QwQ-32B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and QwQ-32B are closely matched at 14.8 and 15.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and QwQ-32B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 14.8 and 15.2.

The models split the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
14.8
#214
15.2
#211
15.0
#208
15.9
#200
8.6
#164
10.3
#149
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 4
2 of 4
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
QwQ-32B
16.7#191
18.2#170
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B · 7 for QwQ-32B

4 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, MATH-500), while QwQ-32B is better at 1 benchmark (LiveCodeBench).

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

38.1B diff

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B has 38.1B more parameters than QwQ-32B, making it 117.2% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
70.6Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
70.6B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
32.5B
QwQ-32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is licensed under MIT, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

MIT

Open weights

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B was released on 2025-01-20, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

QwQ-32B is 1 month newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B's cutoff date.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B or QwQ-32B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and QwQ-32B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 14.8 and 15.2. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is made by DeepSeek and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B scores MATH-500: 94.5%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 65.2%, LiveCodeBench: 57.5%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and QwQ-32B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B supports 128K tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (14.8 vs 15.2), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and QwQ-32B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is developed by DeepSeek and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.