Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs DeepSeek VL2

Comparing DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and DeepSeek VL2 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and DeepSeek VL2 don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

25.2B diff

DeepSeek VL2 has 25.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B, making it 1416.9% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
1.8Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
27.0Bparameters
1.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
27.0B
DeepSeek VL2

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek VL2 specifies input context (129,280 tokens). Only DeepSeek VL2 specifies output context (129,280 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

DeepSeek VL2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B does not.

DeepSeek VL2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is licensed under MIT, while DeepSeek VL2 uses deepseek.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

MIT

Open weights

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B was released on 2025-01-20, while DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is 1 month newer than DeepSeek VL2.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Jan 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

1mo newer
DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Larger context window (129,280 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs DeepSeek VL2.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B or DeepSeek VL2?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B (DeepSeek) and DeepSeek VL2 (DeepSeek) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B compare to DeepSeek VL2 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B scores MATH-500: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 52.7%, GPQA: 33.8%, LiveCodeBench: 16.9%. DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and DeepSeek VL2?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B supports an unknown number of tokens and DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and DeepSeek VL2?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs deepseek). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.