Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok 4 Fast is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

Grok 4 Fast significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4 Fast specifies input context (2,000,000 tokens). Only Grok 4 Fast specifies output context (30,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok 4 Fast
Input2,000,000 tokens
Output30,000 tokens
Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok 4 Fast supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B does not.

Grok 4 Fast can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4 Fast

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is licensed under MIT, while Grok 4 Fast uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

MIT

Open weights

Grok 4 Fast

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B was released on 2025-01-20, while Grok 4 Fast was released on 2025-08-28.

Grok 4 Fast is 7 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Jan 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Grok 4 Fast

Aug 28, 2025

8 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Has open weights
xAI
Larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (85.7% vs 33.8%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (80.0% vs 16.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
xAI
Grok 4 Fast

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Grok 4 Fast.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B or Grok 4 Fast?

Grok 4 Fast significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is made by DeepSeek and Grok 4 Fast is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B compare to Grok 4 Fast in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B scores MATH-500: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 52.7%, GPQA: 33.8%, LiveCodeBench: 16.9%. Grok 4 Fast scores SimpleQA: 95.0%, HMMT 2025: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 92.0%, GPQA: 85.7%, LiveCodeBench: 80.0%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Grok 4 Fast?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok 4 Fast supports 2.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Grok 4 Fast?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Grok 4 Fast?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is developed by DeepSeek and Grok 4 Fast is developed by xAI.