The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Gemma 3 27B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads the LLM Stats Score 10.9 to 8.3.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 10.9 to 8.3, ranking #259 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 10.9 and ranks #259 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Gemma 3 27B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
10.9
#259
8.3
#279
11.3
#255
8.6
#270
5.5
#197
5.3
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.16 / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Gemma 3 27B
13.4#228
17.4#195
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B · 27 for Gemma 3 27B

2 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Gemma 3 27B is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

12.2B diff

Gemma 3 27B has 12.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B, making it 82.4% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
14.8Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3 27B
27.0Bparameters
14.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
27.0B
Gemma 3 27B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 27B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 27B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B does not.

Gemma 3 27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is licensed under MIT, while Gemma 3 27B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

MIT

Open weights

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B was released on 2025-01-20, while Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12.

Gemma 3 27B is 2 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 3 27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3 27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Gemma 3 27B.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B or Gemma 3 27B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads the LLM Stats Score 10.9 to 8.3. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is made by DeepSeek and Gemma 3 27B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B compare to Gemma 3 27B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B scores MATH-500: 93.9%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 59.1%, LiveCodeBench: 53.1%. Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 3 27B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 3 27B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (10.9 vs 8.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 3 27B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is developed by DeepSeek and Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google.