Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

Comparing DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and GPT-5.1 Codex Mini across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and GPT-5.1 Codex Mini don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5.1 Codex Mini specifies input context (400,000 tokens). Only GPT-5.1 Codex Mini specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B does not.

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is licensed under MIT, while GPT-5.1 Codex Mini uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

MIT

Open weights

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B was released on 2025-01-20, while GPT-5.1 Codex Mini was released on 2025-11-12.

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is 10 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

Nov 12, 2025

5 months ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Has open weights
OpenAI
Larger context window (400,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs GPT-5.1 Codex Mini

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B (DeepSeek) and GPT-5.1 Codex Mini (OpenAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B scores MATH-500: 93.9%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 59.1%, LiveCodeBench: 53.1%. GPT-5.1 Codex Mini scores AIME 2025: 42.1%.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-5.1 Codex Mini supports 400K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is developed by DeepSeek and GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is developed by OpenAI.