DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Kimi-k1.5 Comparison

Comparing DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Kimi-k1.5 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2024), while Kimi-k1.5 is better at 1 benchmark (MATH-500).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Sat Mar 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B does not.

Kimi-k1.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is licensed under MIT, while Kimi-k1.5 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

MIT

Open weights

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2025-01-20.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Has open weights
Higher AIME 2024 score (80.0% vs 77.5%)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher MATH-500 score (96.2% vs 93.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5