Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA), while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is better at 1 benchmark (LiveCodeBench).

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

11.8B diff

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B has 11.8B more parameters than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512), making it 393.3% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
14.8Bparameters
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
3.0Bparameters
14.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
3.0B
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) specifies input context (131,100 tokens). Only Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) specifies output context (131,100 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input131,100 tokens
Output131,100 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B does not.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is licensed under MIT, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

MIT

Open weights

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B was released on 2025-01-20, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 11 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

4 months ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher AIME 2024 score (80.0% vs 77.5%)
Higher GPQA score (59.1% vs 53.4%)
Larger context window (131,100 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher LiveCodeBench score (54.8% vs 53.1%)

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is made by DeepSeek and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B scores MATH-500: 93.9%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 59.1%, LiveCodeBench: 53.1%. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) scores AIME 2024: 77.5%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 54.8%, GPQA: 53.4%.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B supports an unknown number of tokens and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is developed by DeepSeek and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is developed by Mistral AI.