The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads the LLM Stats Score 11.0 to -3.8.

DeepSeek · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 11.0 to -3.8, ranking #249 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 11.0 and ranks #249 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
11.0
#249
-3.8
#334
11.3
#245
-4.7
#331
5.6
#191
-6.8
#253
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
13.5#220
-1.1#295
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B · 31 for Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

11.0B diff

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B has 11.0B more parameters than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct, making it 289.5% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
14.8Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
3.8Bparameters
14.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
3.8B
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Phi-3.5-mini-instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Phi-3.5-mini-instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

MIT

Open weights

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B was released on 2025-01-20, while Phi-3.5-mini-instruct was released on 2024-08-23.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is 5 months newer than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

5mo newer
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
✓ Preferred
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B or Phi-3.5-mini-instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads the LLM Stats Score 11.0 to -3.8. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is made by DeepSeek and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B compare to Phi-3.5-mini-instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B scores MATH-500: 93.9%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 59.1%, LiveCodeBench: 53.1%. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct scores GSM8k: 86.2%, ARC-C: 84.6%, RULER: 84.1%, PIQA: 81.0%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B supports an unknown number of tokens and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (11.0 vs -3.8). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is developed by DeepSeek and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is developed by Microsoft.