The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched at 11.3 and 10.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 11.3 and 10.4.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
11.3
#239
10.4
#247
11.6
#236
9.0
#250
5.5
#182
12.5
#130
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
13.5#213
11.8#225
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B · 28 for Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

18.7B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct has 18.7B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B, making it 126.4% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
14.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
33.5Bparameters
14.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
33.5B
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is 1 month newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Feb 28, 2025

1.5 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 11.3 and 10.4. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is made by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B compare to Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B scores MATH-500: 93.9%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 59.1%, LiveCodeBench: 53.1%. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.8%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.3%, HumanEval: 91.5%, ScreenSpot: 88.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (11.3 vs 10.4), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.