The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs DeepSeek VL2

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.2 to 3.0.

DeepSeek · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.2 to 3.0, ranking #246 overall.

DeepSeek VL2 also accepts a larger context window (129,280 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.2 and ranks #246 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose DeepSeek VL2

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 129,280 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
13.2
#246
3.0
#309
13.4
#235
-1.8
#327
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.12 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
129,280

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B · 14 for DeepSeek VL2

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and DeepSeek VL2don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.8B diff

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B has 5.8B more parameters than DeepSeek VL2, making it 21.5% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32.8Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
27.0Bparameters
32.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
27.0B
DeepSeek VL2

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek VL2 accepts 129,280 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek VL2 can generate longer responses up to 129,280 tokens, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

DeepSeek VL2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not.

DeepSeek VL2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while DeepSeek VL2 uses deepseek.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 1 month newer than DeepSeek VL2.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

1mo newer
DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is available from DeepInfra. DeepSeek VL2 is available from Replicate.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.12/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

DeepSeek VL2

replicate logo
Replicate
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and DeepSeek VL2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek VL2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs DeepSeek VL2.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or DeepSeek VL2?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.2 to 3.0. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and DeepSeek VL2 is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to DeepSeek VL2 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and DeepSeek VL2?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and DeepSeek VL2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.2 vs 3.0), context window (128K vs 129K), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs deepseek). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.