Model Comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Grok 4.5Which is better in 2026?
Grok 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 22.2x cheaper per token.
Verdict: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Grok 4.5 — which is better?
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B (by DeepSeek) and Grok 4.5 (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok 4.5 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Grok 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is roughly 22.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Grok 4.5 also accepts a larger context window (500,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B if…
- cost matters — it's about 22.2x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Grok 4.5 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 500,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok 4.5 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Grok 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.12/1M tokens) is 16.7x cheaper than Grok 4.5 ($2.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.18/1M tokens) is 33.3x cheaper than Grok 4.5 ($6.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Grok 4.5 is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Grok 4.5 accepts 500,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's 128,000 tokens. Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Grok 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not.
Grok 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Grok 4.5
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while Grok 4.5 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while Grok 4.5 was released on 2026-07-16.
Grok 4.5 is 18 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.
Jan 20, 2025
1.5 years ago
Jul 16, 2026
2 days ago
1.5yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-01, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Grok 4.5's training data extends to 2026-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date.
—
Feb 2026
Provider Availability
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is available from DeepInfra. Grok 4.5 is available from xAI.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Grok 4.5
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Grok 4.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Grok 4.5.