The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Qwen2 72B Instruct

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.1 to 5.8.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.1 to 5.8, ranking #247 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.1 and ranks #247 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Qwen2 72B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
13.1
#247
5.8
#293
13.3
#236
5.7
#289
8.1
#181
9.8
#167
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.12 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Qwen2 72B Instruct
15.1#217
11.0#246
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B · 17 for Qwen2 72B Instruct

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2 72B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

39.2B diff

Qwen2 72B Instruct has 39.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B, making it 119.5% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct
72.0Bparameters
32.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
72.0B
Qwen2 72B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2 72B Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen2 72B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 6 months newer than Qwen2 72B Instruct.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

6mo newer
Qwen2 72B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Qwen2 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Qwen2 72B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Qwen2 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.1 to 5.8. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and Qwen2 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to Qwen2 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. Qwen2 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.1%, CMMLU: 90.1%, HellaSwag: 87.6%, HumanEval: 86.0%, Winogrande: 85.1%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Qwen2 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and Qwen2 72B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Qwen2 72B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.1 vs 5.8), licensing (MIT vs tongyi-qianwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Qwen2 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen2 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.