The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.12 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
Released
Jan 2025
Sep 2025
License
MIT
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

200.0M diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has 0.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B, making it 0.6% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
33.0Bparameters
32.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 8 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.