Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Qwen3.5-4BWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3.5-4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Qwen3.5-4B — which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B (by DeepSeek) and Qwen3.5-4B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.5-4B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Qwen3.5-4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output

Choose Qwen3.5-4B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.5-4B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.5-4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

28.8B diff

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B has 28.8B more parameters than Qwen3.5-4B, making it 720.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-4B
4.0Bparameters
32.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
4.0B
Qwen3.5-4B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.5-4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not.

Qwen3.5-4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.5-4B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.5-4B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen3.5-4B was released on 2026-03-02.

Qwen3.5-4B is 14 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.5 years ago

Qwen3.5-4B

Mar 2, 2026

4 months ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-4B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (76.2% vs 62.1%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Qwen3.5-4B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.5-4B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-4B

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Qwen3.5-4B.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Qwen3.5-4B?

Qwen3.5-4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3.5-4B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to Qwen3.5-4B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. Qwen3.5-4B scores IFEval: 89.8%, MMLU-Redux: 88.8%, C-Eval: 85.1%, t2-bench: 79.9%, MMLU-Pro: 79.1%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Qwen3.5-4B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and Qwen3.5-4B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Qwen3.5-4B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Qwen3.5-4B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3.5-4B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.