Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

DeepSeek R1 Zero significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Zero outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Zero significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

669.1B diff

DeepSeek R1 Zero has 669.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 35030.9% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
671.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek R1 Zero
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Zero does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Zero is licensed under MIT, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

MIT

Open weights

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Zero was released on 2025-01-20, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 4 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Zero.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Jan 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while DeepSeek R1 Zero's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Zero's cutoff date.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Higher GPQA score (73.3% vs 23.7%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (50.0% vs 13.2%)
Google
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Zero or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

DeepSeek R1 Zero significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Zero is made by DeepSeek and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Zero compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Zero scores MATH-500: 95.9%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Zero and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Zero and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

DeepSeek R1 Zero is developed by DeepSeek and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google.