The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

DeepSeek R1 Zero leads the LLM Stats Score 16.0 to 2.0.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Zero leads the overall LLM Stats Score 16.0 to 2.0, ranking #232 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Zero wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Zero

  • overall performance matters — it scores 16.0 and ranks #232 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.09/M input and $0.09/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
16.0
#232
2.0
#323
16.3
#222
2.0
#313
4.3
#215
10.0
#172
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
17.5#195
4.9#278
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Zero · 15 for Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Zero outperforms in 1 benchmarks (LiveCodeBench), while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Zero significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

639.0B diff

DeepSeek R1 Zero has 639.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct, making it 1996.9% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
671.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
32.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek R1 Zero
32.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri Sep 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Zero is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Zero was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

DeepSeek R1 Zero is 4 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

4mo newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Zero and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Zero
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Zero or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Zero leads the LLM Stats Score 16.0 to 2.0. DeepSeek R1 Zero is made by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Zero compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Zero scores MATH-500: 95.9%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Zero and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Zero supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Zero and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (16.0 vs 2.0), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Zero and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Zero is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.