The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

DeepSeek R1 Zero leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 1.6.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Zero leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 1.6, ranking #252 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Zero wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Zero

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.6 and ranks #252 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.09/M input and $0.09/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.6
#252
1.6
#343
15.8
#242
1.6
#333
4.1
#232
9.8
#189
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
17.5#204
4.9#289
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Zero · 15 for Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Zero outperforms in 1 benchmarks (LiveCodeBench), while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Zero significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Oct 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

639.0B diff

DeepSeek R1 Zero has 639.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct, making it 1996.9% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
671.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
32.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek R1 Zero
32.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sun Oct 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Zero is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Zero was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

DeepSeek R1 Zero is 4 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Jan 20, 2025

1.8 years ago

4mo newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Zero and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Zero
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Zero or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Zero leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to 1.6. DeepSeek R1 Zero is made by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Zero compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Zero scores MATH-500: 95.9%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Zero and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Zero supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Zero and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.6 vs 1.6), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Zero and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Zero is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.