DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) vs Llama 4 Scout Comparison

Comparing DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) and Llama 4 Scout across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MMLU-Pro), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Scout costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) ($0.28/1M tokens) is 3.5x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) ($0.42/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$0.42
Best providerDeepSeek
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

576.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) has 576.0B more parameters than Llama 4 Scout, making it 528.4% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
685.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
685.0B
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)'s 131,072 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is limited to 65,536 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
Input131,072 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is licensed under MIT, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

MIT

Open weights

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) was released on 2025-12-01, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is 8 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

Dec 1, 2025

3 months ago

8mo newer
Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is available from DeepSeek. Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.42/1M

Llama 4 Scout

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.59/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher GPQA score (82.4% vs 57.2%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (83.3% vs 32.8%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (85.0% vs 74.3%)
Larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
Meta
Llama 4 Scout