The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$0.28 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.42 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
Released
Dec 2025
Sep 2025
License
MIT
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

652.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) has 652.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct, making it 1975.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
685.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
33.0Bparameters
685.0B
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
Input131,072 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) was released on 2025-12-01, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is 2 months newer than Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)

Dec 1, 2025

8 months ago

2mo newer
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) scores AIME 2025: 93.1%, HMMT 2025: 90.2%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%, LiveCodeBench: 83.3%, GPQA: 82.4%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking) is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.