Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Claude 3 Haiku

DeepSeek-V2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V2.5 is 2.9x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V2.5 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU), while Claude 3 Haiku is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V2.5 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.14/1M tokens) is 1.8x cheaper than Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 4.5x cheaper than Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3 Haiku is more expensive than DeepSeek-V2.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

DeepSeek-V2.5

Input tokens$0.14

Output tokens$0.28

Best providerDeepSeek

Claude 3 Haiku

Input tokens$0.25

Output tokens$1.25

Best providerAnthropic

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V2.5's 8,192 tokens. Claude 3 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while DeepSeek-V2.5 is limited to 8,192 tokens.

DeepSeek-V2.5

Input8,192 tokens

Output8,192 tokens

Claude 3 Haiku

Input200,000 tokens

Output200,000 tokens

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V2.5 does not.

Claude 3 Haiku can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V2.5

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Claude 3 Haiku

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V2.5 is licensed under deepseek, while Claude 3 Haiku uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek

Open weights

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released on 2024-05-08, while Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13.

DeepSeek-V2.5 is 2 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

DeepSeek-V2.5

May 8, 2024

2.0 years ago

1mo newer

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V2.5 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic. Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.

DeepSeek-V2.5

DeepSeek

Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.40/1M

Hyperbolic

Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

Claude 3 Haiku

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek-V2.5

View details

DeepSeek

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Higher GSM8k score (95.1% vs 88.9%)

Higher HumanEval score (89.0% vs 75.9%)

Higher MATH score (74.7% vs 38.9%)

Higher MMLU score (80.4% vs 75.2%)

Claude 3 Haiku

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	DeepSeek-V2.5	Claude 3 Haiku

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Claude 3 Haiku.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V2.5 or Claude 3 Haiku?

DeepSeek-V2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V2.5 is made by DeepSeek and Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V2.5 compare to Claude 3 Haiku in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V2.5 scores GSM8k: 95.1%, MT-Bench: 90.2%, HumanEval: 89.0%, BBH: 84.3%, AlignBench: 80.4%. Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 cheaper than Claude 3 Haiku?

DeepSeek-V2.5 is 1.8x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V2.5 costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via deepseek. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output via anthropic.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V2.5 and Claude 3 Haiku?

DeepSeek-V2.5 supports 8K tokens and Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V2.5 and Claude 3 Haiku?

Key differences include context window (8K vs 200K), input pricing ($0.14 vs $0.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (deepseek vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V2.5 and Claude 3 Haiku?

DeepSeek-V2.5 is developed by DeepSeek and Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic.