Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 vs GPT-5.1 Thinking

GPT-5.1 Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V2.5 is 19.6x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V2.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-5.1 Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-Bench Verified).

GPT-5.1 Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Apr 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V2.5 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.14/1M tokens) is 8.9x cheaper than GPT-5.1 Thinking ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 35.7x cheaper than GPT-5.1 Thinking ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.1 Thinking is more expensive than DeepSeek-V2.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Apr 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerDeepSeek
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.1 Thinking accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V2.5's 8,192 tokens. GPT-5.1 Thinking can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while DeepSeek-V2.5 is limited to 8,192 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input8,192 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Apr 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-5.1 Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V2.5 does not.

GPT-5.1 Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-5.1 Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V2.5 is licensed under deepseek, while GPT-5.1 Thinking uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek

Open weights

GPT-5.1 Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released on 2024-05-08, while GPT-5.1 Thinking was released on 2025-11-12.

GPT-5.1 Thinking is 18 months newer than DeepSeek-V2.5.

DeepSeek-V2.5

May 8, 2024

1.9 years ago

GPT-5.1 Thinking

Nov 12, 2025

5 months ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V2.5 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic. GPT-5.1 Thinking is available from OpenAI.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

GPT-5.1 Thinking

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Larger context window (400,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (76.3% vs 16.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V2.5 vs GPT-5.1 Thinking

GPT-5.1 Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V2.5 is made by DeepSeek and GPT-5.1 Thinking is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
DeepSeek-V2.5 scores GSM8k: 95.1%, MT-Bench: 90.2%, HumanEval: 89.0%, BBH: 84.3%, AlignBench: 80.4%. GPT-5.1 Thinking scores Tau2 Telecom: 95.6%, AIME 2025: 94.0%, BrowseComp Long Context 128k: 90.0%, GPQA: 88.1%, MMMU: 85.4%.
DeepSeek-V2.5 is 8.9x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V2.5 costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via deepseek. GPT-5.1 Thinking costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via openai.
DeepSeek-V2.5 supports 8K tokens and GPT-5.1 Thinking supports 400K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (8K vs 400K), input pricing ($0.14 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (deepseek vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek-V2.5 is developed by DeepSeek and GPT-5.1 Thinking is developed by OpenAI.