The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Kimi-k1.5

Kimi-k1.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 17.2 to 8.1.

DeepSeek · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi-k1.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 17.2 to 8.1, ranking #226 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi-k1.5 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V2.5

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Kimi-k1.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 17.2 and ranks #226 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
8.1
#289
17.2
#226
8.2
#285
16.4
#223
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.14 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.28 / M
— / M
Context window
8,192
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V2.5
Kimi-k1.5
14.0#224
20.2#162
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for DeepSeek-V2.5 · 9 for Kimi-k1.5

1 shared

DeepSeek-V2.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi-k1.5 is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Kimi-k1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Oct 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V2.5 specifies input context (8,192 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V2.5 specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input8,192 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V2.5 does not.

Kimi-k1.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V2.5 is licensed under deepseek, while Kimi-k1.5 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek

Open weights

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released on 2024-05-08, while Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20.

Kimi-k1.5 is 9 months newer than DeepSeek-V2.5.

DeepSeek-V2.5

May 8, 2024

2.4 years ago

Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V2.5 and Kimi-k1.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V2.5
✓ Preferred
Kimi-k1.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Kimi-k1.5.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V2.5 or Kimi-k1.5?

Kimi-k1.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 17.2 to 8.1. DeepSeek-V2.5 is made by DeepSeek and Kimi-k1.5 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V2.5 compare to Kimi-k1.5 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V2.5 scores GSM8k: 95.1%, MT-Bench: 90.2%, HumanEval: 89.0%, BBH: 84.3%, AlignBench: 80.4%. Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V2.5 and Kimi-k1.5?

DeepSeek-V2.5 supports 8K tokens and Kimi-k1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V2.5 and Kimi-k1.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (8.1 vs 17.2), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (deepseek vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V2.5 and Kimi-k1.5?

DeepSeek-V2.5 is developed by DeepSeek and Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI.