The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

DeepSeek-V2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 8.1 to -1.3. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is 3.5x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 8.1 to -1.3, ranking #280 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V2.5 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is roughly 3.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V2.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 8.1 and ranks #280 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 3.5x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
8.1
#280
-1.3
#333
8.2
#276
-0.8
#324
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.14 / M
$0.05 / M
Output price
$0.28 / M
$0.05 / M
Context window
8,192
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V2.5
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
14.0#222
1.8#294
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for DeepSeek-V2.5 · 11 for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

2 shared

DeepSeek-V2.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (MATH, MMLU), while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.14/1M tokens) is 2.8x more expensive than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct ($0.05/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 5.6x more expensive than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct ($0.05/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V2.5 is more expensive than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerDeepSeek
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Input tokens$0.05
Output tokens$0.05
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

225.4B diff

DeepSeek-V2.5 has 225.4B more parameters than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct, making it 2126.4% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
236.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
10.6Bparameters
236.0B
DeepSeek-V2.5
10.6B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V2.5's 8,192 tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while DeepSeek-V2.5 is limited to 8,192 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input8,192 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V2.5 does not.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V2.5 is licensed under deepseek, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct uses Llama 3.2 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek

Open weights

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released on 2024-05-08, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is 5 months newer than DeepSeek-V2.5.

DeepSeek-V2.5

May 8, 2024

2.3 years ago

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

2.0 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while DeepSeek-V2.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V2.5's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V2.5

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Dec 2023

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V2.5 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Sambanova, Bedrock, Groq, Together, Fireworks.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.05/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.16/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.16/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V2.5 and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V2.5
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V2.5 or Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 8.1 to -1.3. DeepSeek-V2.5 is made by DeepSeek and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V2.5 compare to Llama 3.2 11B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V2.5 scores GSM8k: 95.1%, MT-Bench: 90.2%, HumanEval: 89.0%, BBH: 84.3%, AlignBench: 80.4%. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct scores AI2D: 91.1%, DocVQA: 88.4%, ChartQA: 83.4%, VQAv2 (test): 75.2%, MMLU: 73.0%.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 cheaper than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is 2.8x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V2.5 costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via deepseek. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct costs $0.05/M input and $0.05/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V2.5 and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V2.5 supports 8K tokens and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V2.5 and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (8.1 vs -1.3), context window (8K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.14 vs $0.05/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (deepseek vs Llama 3.2 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V2.5 and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V2.5 is developed by DeepSeek and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is developed by Meta.