Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 vs MedGemma 4B IT

Comparing DeepSeek-V2.5 and MedGemma 4B IT across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V2.5 and MedGemma 4B IT don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 29 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerDeepSeek
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

231.7B diff

DeepSeek-V2.5 has 231.7B more parameters than MedGemma 4B IT, making it 5388.4% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
236.0Bparameters
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
4.3Bparameters
236.0B
DeepSeek-V2.5
4.3B
MedGemma 4B IT

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V2.5 specifies input context (8,192 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V2.5 specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input8,192 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Apr 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V2.5 does not.

MedGemma 4B IT can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V2.5 is licensed under deepseek, while MedGemma 4B IT uses Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek

Open weights

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released on 2024-05-08, while MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20.

MedGemma 4B IT is 13 months newer than DeepSeek-V2.5.

DeepSeek-V2.5

May 8, 2024

2.0 years ago

MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Larger context window (8,192 tokens)
Google
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Google
MedGemma 4B IT

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V2.5 vs MedGemma 4B IT

DeepSeek-V2.5 (DeepSeek) and MedGemma 4B IT (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
DeepSeek-V2.5 scores GSM8k: 95.1%, MT-Bench: 90.2%, HumanEval: 89.0%, BBH: 84.3%, AlignBench: 80.4%. MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%.
DeepSeek-V2.5 supports 8K tokens and MedGemma 4B IT supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (deepseek vs Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek-V2.5 is developed by DeepSeek and MedGemma 4B IT is developed by Google.