Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 30B A3B is 1.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V2.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 1 benchmark (Arena Hard).

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.14/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V2.5 is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

DeepSeek-V2.5

Input tokens$0.14

Output tokens$0.28

Best providerDeepSeek

Qwen3 30B A3B

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

205.5B diff

DeepSeek-V2.5 has 205.5B more parameters than Qwen3 30B A3B, making it 673.8% larger.

DeepSeek-V2.5

236.0Bparameters

Qwen3 30B A3B

30.5Bparameters

236.0B

DeepSeek-V2.5

30.5B

Qwen3 30B A3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 30B A3B accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V2.5's 8,192 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while DeepSeek-V2.5 is limited to 8,192 tokens.

DeepSeek-V2.5

Input8,192 tokens

Output8,192 tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V2.5 is licensed under deepseek, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek

Open weights

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released on 2024-05-08, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 30B A3B is 12 months newer than DeepSeek-V2.5.

DeepSeek-V2.5

May 8, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.1 years ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V2.5 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

DeepSeek-V2.5

DeepSeek

Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.40/1M

Hyperbolic

Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

Qwen3 30B A3B

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek-V2.5

View details

DeepSeek

Less expensive output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Higher Arena Hard score (91.0% vs 76.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	DeepSeek-V2.5	Qwen3 30B A3B

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V2.5 or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V2.5 is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V2.5 compare to Qwen3 30B A3B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V2.5 scores GSM8k: 95.1%, MT-Bench: 90.2%, HumanEval: 89.0%, BBH: 84.3%, AlignBench: 80.4%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V2.5 costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via deepseek. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B?

DeepSeek-V2.5 supports 8K tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Key differences include context window (8K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.14 vs $0.10/M), licensing (deepseek vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V2.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B?

DeepSeek-V2.5 is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.