Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V2.5 is 1.9x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V2.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V2.5 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.14/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.70/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is more expensive than DeepSeek-V2.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerDeepSeek
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.70
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

205.0B diff

DeepSeek-V2.5 has 205.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct, making it 661.3% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
236.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
31.0Bparameters
236.0B
DeepSeek-V2.5
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V2.5's 8,192 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 32,768 tokens, while DeepSeek-V2.5 is limited to 8,192 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input8,192 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V2.5 does not.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V2.5 is licensed under deepseek, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released on 2024-05-08, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 17 months newer than DeepSeek-V2.5.

DeepSeek-V2.5

May 8, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V2.5 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.70/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.29/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.99/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher MMLU score (85.0% vs 80.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V2.5 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V2.5 is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V2.5 compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V2.5 scores GSM8k: 95.1%, MT-Bench: 90.2%, HumanEval: 89.0%, BBH: 84.3%, AlignBench: 80.4%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, OCRBench: 90.3%, MMLU-Redux: 88.4%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.0%.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V2.5 is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V2.5 costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via deepseek. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.20/M input and $0.70/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V2.5 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V2.5 supports 8K tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V2.5 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (8K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.14 vs $0.20/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (deepseek vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V2.5 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V2.5 is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.