Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs Claude Opus 4.1

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 0324 is 60.6x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3 0324 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude Opus 4.1 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3 0324 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 0324 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 53.6x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 ($15.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 0324 ($1.14/1M tokens) is 65.8x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 ($75.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.1 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3 0324.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.14
Best providerNovita
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.1 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3 0324's 163,840 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 0324 can generate longer responses up to 163,840 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.1 is limited to 32,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3 0324 does not.

Claude Opus 4.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude Opus 4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while Claude Opus 4.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

Claude Opus 4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3 0324 was released on 2025-03-25, while Claude Opus 4.1 was released on 2025-08-05.

Claude Opus 4.1 is 4 months newer than DeepSeek-V3 0324.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

Mar 25, 2025

1.1 years ago

Claude Opus 4.1

Aug 5, 2025

9 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is available from Novita. Claude Opus 4.1 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.14/1M

Claude Opus 4.1

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (80.9% vs 68.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs Claude Opus 4.1.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3 0324 or Claude Opus 4.1?

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 0324 is made by DeepSeek and Claude Opus 4.1 is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V3 0324 compare to Claude Opus 4.1 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3 0324 scores MATH-500: 94.0%, MMLU-Pro: 81.2%, GPQA: 68.4%, AIME 2024: 59.4%, LiveCodeBench: 49.2%. Claude Opus 4.1 scores MMMLU: 89.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 82.4%, GPQA: 80.9%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, MMMU (validation): 77.1%.

Is DeepSeek-V3 0324 cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1?

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is 53.6x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3 0324 costs $0.28/M input and $1.14/M output via novita. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3 0324 and Claude Opus 4.1?

DeepSeek-V3 0324 supports 164K tokens and Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3 0324 and Claude Opus 4.1?

Key differences include context window (164K vs 200K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $15.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed) vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3 0324 and Claude Opus 4.1?

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is developed by DeepSeek and Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic.