Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 3.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3 0324 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, LiveCodeBench, MATH-500).

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue May 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 0324 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 2.3x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.12/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 0324 ($1.14/1M tokens) is 6.3x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V3 0324 is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue May 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.14
Best providerNovita
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input tokens$0.12
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

638.2B diff

DeepSeek-V3 0324 has 638.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B, making it 1945.7% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
671.0Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32.8Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-V3 0324
32.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V3 0324 accepts 163,840 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 0324 can generate longer responses up to 163,840 tokens, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue May 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3 0324 was released on 2025-03-25, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20.

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is 2 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

Mar 25, 2025

1.1 years ago

2mo newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is available from Novita. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is available from DeepInfra.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.14/1M

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.12/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Larger context window (163,840 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (68.4% vs 62.1%)
DeepSeek
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher AIME 2024 score (83.3% vs 59.4%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (57.2% vs 49.2%)
Higher MATH-500 score (94.3% vs 94.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3 0324 or DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 0324 is made by DeepSeek and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V3 0324 compare to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3 0324 scores MATH-500: 94.0%, MMLU-Pro: 81.2%, GPQA: 68.4%, AIME 2024: 59.4%, LiveCodeBench: 49.2%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%.

Is DeepSeek-V3 0324 cheaper than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 2.3x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3 0324 costs $0.28/M input and $1.14/M output via novita. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3 0324 and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

DeepSeek-V3 0324 supports 164K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3 0324 and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

Key differences include context window (164K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.12/M), licensing (MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed) vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.