Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

DeepSeek-V3 0324 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 0324 is 50.5x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3 0324 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MMLU-Pro), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3 0324 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3 0324 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 0324 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 71.4x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 0324 ($1.14/1M tokens) is 35.1x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3 0324.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.14
Best providerNovita
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

663.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3 0324 has 663.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed, making it 8287.5% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
671.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-V3 0324
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V3 0324 accepts 163,840 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 0324 can generate longer responses up to 163,840 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3 0324 does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3 0324 was released on 2025-03-25, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 3 months newer than DeepSeek-V3 0324.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

Mar 25, 2025

1.0 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while DeepSeek-V3 0324's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3 0324's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is available from Novita. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.14/1M

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (163,840 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (68.4% vs 23.7%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (49.2% vs 13.2%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (81.2% vs 50.6%)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

DeepSeek-V3 0324 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 0324 is made by DeepSeek and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
DeepSeek-V3 0324 scores MATH-500: 94.0%, MMLU-Pro: 81.2%, GPQA: 68.4%, AIME 2024: 59.4%, LiveCodeBench: 49.2%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.
DeepSeek-V3 0324 is 71.4x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3 0324 costs $0.28/M input and $1.14/M output via novita. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together.
DeepSeek-V3 0324 supports 164K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (164K vs 32K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $20.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed) vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek-V3 0324 is developed by DeepSeek and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google.