Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 0324 is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3 0324 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3 0324 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 0324 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 0324 ($1.14/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3 0324.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.14
Best providerNovita
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMeituan
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

111.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3 0324 has 111.0B more parameters than LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601, making it 19.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
671.0Bparameters
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
560.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-V3 0324
560.0B
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V3 0324 accepts 163,840 input tokens compared to LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 0324 can generate longer responses up to 163,840 tokens, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3 0324 was released on 2025-03-25, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 was released on 2026-01-14.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is 10 months newer than DeepSeek-V3 0324.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

Mar 25, 2025

1.2 years ago

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

Jan 14, 2026

4 months ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is available from Novita. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is available from Meituan.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.14/1M

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (163,840 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (80.5% vs 68.4%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (82.8% vs 49.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3 0324 or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 0324 is made by DeepSeek and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is made by Meituan. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V3 0324 compare to LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3 0324 scores MATH-500: 94.0%, MMLU-Pro: 81.2%, GPQA: 68.4%, AIME 2024: 59.4%, LiveCodeBench: 49.2%. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 scores AIME 2025: 99.6%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Tau2 Retail: 88.6%, LiveCodeBench: 82.8%, GPQA: 80.5%.

Is DeepSeek-V3 0324 cheaper than LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is 1.1x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3 0324 costs $0.28/M input and $1.14/M output via novita. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via meituan.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3 0324 and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

DeepSeek-V3 0324 supports 164K tokens and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3 0324 and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

Key differences include context window (164K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.30/M), licensing (MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed) vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3 0324 and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is developed by DeepSeek and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is developed by Meituan.