Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3 0324 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Phi 4 Reasoning is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, LiveCodeBench).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.14
Best providerNovita
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

657.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3 0324 has 657.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning, making it 4692.9% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
671.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
14.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-V3 0324
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V3 0324 specifies input context (163,840 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V3 0324 specifies output context (163,840 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Apr 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3 0324 was released on 2025-03-25, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

Phi 4 Reasoning is 1 month newer than DeepSeek-V3 0324.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

Mar 25, 2025

1.1 years ago

Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

11 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while DeepSeek-V3 0324's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3 0324's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V3 0324

—

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Larger context window (163,840 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (68.4% vs 65.8%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (81.2% vs 74.3%)
Microsoft
Higher AIME 2024 score (75.3% vs 59.4%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (53.8% vs 49.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 0324 is made by DeepSeek and Phi 4 Reasoning is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
DeepSeek-V3 0324 scores MATH-500: 94.0%, MMLU-Pro: 81.2%, GPQA: 68.4%, AIME 2024: 59.4%, LiveCodeBench: 49.2%. Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%.
DeepSeek-V3 0324 supports 164K tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed) vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek-V3 0324 is developed by DeepSeek and Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.