Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 is 7.2x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is better at 5 benchmarks (Aider-Polyglot, GPQA, LiveCodeBench, SimpleQA, SWE-Bench Verified).

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($0.27/1M tokens) is 4.6x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($1.10/1M tokens) is 9.1x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Input tokens$0.27
Output tokens$1.10
Best providerDeepSeek
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is limited to 65,535 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,535 tokens
Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3 does not.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3 was released on 2024-12-25, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 was released on 2025-06-05.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is 5 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.

DeepSeek-V3

Dec 25, 2024

1.4 years ago

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jun 5, 2025

11 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while DeepSeek-V3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V3

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3 is available from DeepSeek. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is available from Google.

DeepSeek-V3

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.10/1M

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher Aider-Polyglot score (82.2% vs 49.6%)
Higher GPQA score (86.4% vs 59.1%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (69.0% vs 37.6%)
Higher SimpleQA score (54.0% vs 24.9%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (67.2% vs 42.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 is made by DeepSeek and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V3 compare to Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3 scores DROP: 91.6%, CLUEWSC: 90.9%, MATH-500: 90.2%, MMLU-Redux: 89.1%, MMLU: 88.5%. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 89.2%, AIME 2025: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, VideoMMMU: 83.6%.

Is DeepSeek-V3 cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

DeepSeek-V3 is 4.6x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3 costs $0.27/M input and $1.10/M output via deepseek. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

DeepSeek-V3 supports 131K tokens and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.27 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed) vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

DeepSeek-V3 is developed by DeepSeek and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is developed by Google.