The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V3 vs Gemma 2 9B

DeepSeek-V3 leads the LLM Stats Score 15.7 to -4.9.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.7 to -4.9, ranking #227 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V3 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.7 and ranks #227 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024

Choose Gemma 2 9B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.7
#227
-4.9
#353
14.8
#226
-5.2
#346
6.2
#191
-11.0
#264
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.27 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.89 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V3
Gemma 2 9B
18.0#188
-3.8#314
19.9#67
-0.1#183
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for DeepSeek-V3 · 16 for Gemma 2 9B

1 shared

DeepSeek-V3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Gemma 2 9B is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

661.8B diff

DeepSeek-V3 has 661.8B more parameters than Gemma 2 9B, making it 7161.9% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
671.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 2 9B
9.2Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-V3
9.2B
Gemma 2 9B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V3 specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V3 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Google
Gemma 2 9B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while Gemma 2 9B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3 was released on 2024-12-25, while Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27.

DeepSeek-V3 is 6 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.

DeepSeek-V3

Dec 25, 2024

1.7 years ago

6mo newer
Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3 and Gemma 2 9B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V3
✓ Preferred
Gemma 2 9B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 vs Gemma 2 9B.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3 or Gemma 2 9B?

DeepSeek-V3 leads the LLM Stats Score 15.7 to -4.9. DeepSeek-V3 is made by DeepSeek and Gemma 2 9B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V3 compare to Gemma 2 9B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3 scores DROP: 91.6%, CLUEWSC: 90.9%, MATH-500: 90.2%, MMLU-Redux: 89.1%, MMLU: 88.5%. Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3 and Gemma 2 9B?

DeepSeek-V3 supports 131K tokens and Gemma 2 9B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3 and Gemma 2 9B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.7 vs -4.9), licensing (MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed) vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3 and Gemma 2 9B?

DeepSeek-V3 is developed by DeepSeek and Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google.