Model Comparison
DeepSeek-V3 vs Jamba 1.5 LargeWhich is better in 2026?
DeepSeek-V3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 is 7.3x cheaper per token.
Verdict: DeepSeek-V3 vs Jamba 1.5 Large — which is better?
DeepSeek-V3 (by DeepSeek) and Jamba 1.5 Large (by AI21 Labs) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
DeepSeek-V3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Jamba 1.5 Large is better at 0 benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, DeepSeek-V3 is roughly 7.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Jamba 1.5 Large also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose DeepSeek-V3 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 7.3x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024
Choose Jamba 1.5 Large if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
DeepSeek-V3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Jamba 1.5 Large is better at 0 benchmarks.
DeepSeek-V3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($0.27/1M tokens) is 7.4x cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Large ($2.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($1.10/1M tokens) is 7.3x cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Large ($8.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Jamba 1.5 Large is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
DeepSeek-V3 has 273.0B more parameters than Jamba 1.5 Large, making it 68.6% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Jamba 1.5 Large accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3's 131,072 tokens. Jamba 1.5 Large can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while DeepSeek-V3 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek-V3 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while Jamba 1.5 Large uses Jamba Open Model License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)
Open weights
Jamba Open Model License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V3 was released on 2024-12-25, while Jamba 1.5 Large was released on 2024-08-22.
DeepSeek-V3 is 4 months newer than Jamba 1.5 Large.
Dec 25, 2024
1.5 years ago
4mo newerAug 22, 2024
1.9 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Jamba 1.5 Large has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-03-05, while DeepSeek-V3's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Jamba 1.5 Large's training data extends to 2024-03-05, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3's cutoff date.
—
Mar 2024
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V3 is available from DeepSeek. Jamba 1.5 Large is available from Bedrock, Google.
DeepSeek-V3
Jamba 1.5 Large
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
DeepSeek-V3
View detailsDeepSeek
Jamba 1.5 Large
View detailsAI21 Labs
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3 and Jamba 1.5 Large side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 vs Jamba 1.5 Large.