Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3 vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 30B A3B is 3.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue May 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($0.27/1M tokens) is 2.7x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($1.10/1M tokens) is 3.7x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V3 is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Tue May 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

DeepSeek-V3

Input tokens$0.27

Output tokens$1.10

Best providerDeepSeek

Qwen3 30B A3B

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

640.5B diff

DeepSeek-V3 has 640.5B more parameters than Qwen3 30B A3B, making it 2100.0% larger.

DeepSeek-V3

671.0Bparameters

Qwen3 30B A3B

30.5Bparameters

671.0B

DeepSeek-V3

30.5B

Qwen3 30B A3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V3 accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3 30B A3B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek-V3

Input131,072 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Tue May 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3 was released on 2024-12-25, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 30B A3B is 4 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.

DeepSeek-V3

Dec 25, 2024

1.4 years ago

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.0 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3 is available from DeepSeek. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

DeepSeek-V3

DeepSeek

Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.10/1M

Qwen3 30B A3B

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek-V3

View details

DeepSeek

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)

Qwen3 30B A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Higher AIME 2024 score (80.4% vs 39.2%)

Higher GPQA score (65.8% vs 59.1%)

Higher LiveCodeBench score (62.6% vs 37.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	DeepSeek-V3	Qwen3 30B A3B

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 vs Qwen3 30B A3B.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3 or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V3 compare to Qwen3 30B A3B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3 scores DROP: 91.6%, CLUEWSC: 90.9%, MATH-500: 90.2%, MMLU-Redux: 89.1%, MMLU: 88.5%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.

Is DeepSeek-V3 cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B is 2.7x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3 costs $0.27/M input and $1.10/M output via deepseek. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3 and Qwen3 30B A3B?

DeepSeek-V3 supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3 and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.27 vs $0.10/M), licensing (MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed) vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3 and Qwen3 30B A3B?

DeepSeek-V3 is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.