Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is 3.8x cheaper per token.

Verdict: DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking — which is better?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale (by DeepSeek) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Humanity's Last Exam), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is roughly 3.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 3.8x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Humanity's Last Exam), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.6x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($0.45/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale ($0.42/1M tokens) is 8.3x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($3.49/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$0.42
Best providerDeepSeek
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input tokens$0.45
Output tokens$3.49
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

449.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 449.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking, making it 190.3% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
685.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
236.0Bparameters
685.0B
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
236.0B
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is limited to 131,072 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale does not.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale was released on 2025-12-01, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is 2 months newer than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Dec 1, 2025

6 months ago

2mo newer
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is available from DeepSeek. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.42/1M

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.45/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.49/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.98/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.95/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher AIME 2025 score (96.0% vs 89.7%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (30.6% vs 13.6%)
Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores HMMT 2025: 99.2%, AIME 2025: 96.0%, CodeForces: 90.0%, t2-bench: 80.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.1%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking scores ZebraLogic: 97.3%, DocVQAtest: 96.5%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, CountBench: 93.7%, MMLU-Redux: 93.7%.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is 1.6x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs $0.28/M input and $0.42/M output via deepseek. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking costs $0.45/M input and $3.49/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.45/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.