The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs GLM-5V-Turbo

Comparing DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and GLM-5V-Turbo across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

DeepSeek · Zhipu AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and GLM-5V-Turbo trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is roughly 5.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

  • cost matters — it's about 5.8x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose GLM-5V-Turbo

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.20/M input and $4.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
DeepSeek
GLM-5V-Turbo
Zhipu AI
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.22 / M
$1.20 / M
Output price
$0.66 / M
$4.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
200,000
Released
Aug 2026
Apr 2026
License
Unknown
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and GLM-5V-Turbodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp ($0.22/1M tokens) is 5.5x cheaper than GLM-5V-Turbo ($1.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp ($0.66/1M tokens) is 6.1x cheaper than GLM-5V-Turbo ($4.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5V-Turbo is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
Input tokens$0.22
Output tokens$0.66
Best providerDeepSeek
Zhipu AI
GLM-5V-Turbo
Input tokens$1.20
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GLM-5V-Turbo's 200,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while GLM-5V-Turbo is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5V-Turbo
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and GLM-5V-Turbo support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-5V-Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp was released on 2026-08-21, while GLM-5V-Turbo was released on 2026-04-02.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is 5 months newer than GLM-5V-Turbo.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

Aug 21, 2026

3 days ago

4mo newer
GLM-5V-Turbo

Apr 2, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is available from DeepSeek. GLM-5V-Turbo is available from ZAI.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.66/1M

GLM-5V-Turbo

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and GLM-5V-Turbo side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
✓ Preferred
GLM-5V-Turbo
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs GLM-5V-Turbo.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or GLM-5V-Turbo?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp (DeepSeek) and GLM-5V-Turbo (Zhipu AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp compare to GLM-5V-Turbo in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 83.9%, DSBench-Hard: 63.6%, DeepSWE: 59.3%, NL2Repo: 57.7%, ZEROBench: 35.0%. GLM-5V-Turbo scores Design2Code: 94.8%, Flame-VLM-Code: 93.8%, V*: 89.0%, WebVoyager: 88.5%, PinchBench: 80.7%.

Is DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp cheaper than GLM-5V-Turbo?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is 5.5x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp costs $0.22/M input and $0.66/M output via deepseek. GLM-5V-Turbo costs $1.20/M input and $4.00/M output via z.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and GLM-5V-Turbo?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp supports 1.0M tokens and GLM-5V-Turbo supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and GLM-5V-Turbo?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 200K), input pricing ($0.22 vs $1.20/M), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and GLM-5V-Turbo?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is developed by DeepSeek and GLM-5V-Turbo is developed by Zhipu AI.

Related comparisons