DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comparing DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
DeepSeek · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
On price, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is roughly 43.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
Choose Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
- cost matters — it's about 43.5x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Llama 3.2 3B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Playground indexes and blind preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ($0.43/1M tokens) is 43.5x more expensive than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct ($0.01/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ($0.87/1M tokens) is 43.5x more expensive than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct ($0.02/1M tokens).
In conclusion, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is more expensive than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 has 1596.8B more parameters than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct, making it 49744.2% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Llama 3.2 3B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is licensed under MIT, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct uses Llama 3.2 Community License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Llama 3.2 Community License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released on 2026-08-13, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is 23 months newer than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.
Aug 13, 2026
1 weeks ago
1.9yr newerSep 25, 2024
1.9 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Novita, Together. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.