The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Comparing DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Phi 4 Reasoning across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

DeepSeek · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Phi 4 Reasoning trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.43 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
Released
Aug 2026
Apr 2025
License
MIT
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Phi 4 Reasoningdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1586.0B diff

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 has 1586.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning, making it 11328.6% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
1.6Tparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
14.0Bparameters
1600.0B
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 specifies output context (393,216 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

MIT

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released on 2026-08-13, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is 16 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Aug 13, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.3yr newer
Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Phi 4 Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Phi 4 Reasoning.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Phi 4 Reasoning?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) and Phi 4 Reasoning (Microsoft) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 compare to Phi 4 Reasoning in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.9%, CyberGym: 83.3%, Toolathlon: 74.1%, DSBench-FullStack: 71.1%, DSBench-Hard: 67.2%. Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Phi 4 Reasoning?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports 1.0M tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Phi 4 Reasoning?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is developed by DeepSeek and Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.